Photo - Dear Maria Hoffman, I know for a fact that you have written many letters to Arizona parents over the last 6+ years. You have earned between $4,000- $8,000 a month over the course of those years (because we have your contracts of hire with the state.) You are contracted to be the main gate keeper, to stop parents from going to any government officials to ask for help. I also have personal emails wherein government officials, who had meetings scheduled personally with me, had to recontact me and cancel those meetings, because they were told directly by you that they were not allowed to meet with me. I ask you since I am an advocate for Arizona and fight for multiple families how the hell would you know what it is that I would be talking to them about? What you are doing is illegal!!!! ~Melissa Diegel The following is an actual email example of an Arizona father who has fought avidly for years to see his precious daughters: 08/15/10 at 9:00Maria Hoffman AM Mr. Stark: I was going to send you another e-mail to finally put closure to your contact with Arizona Government but you sent this so let me respond: #1: Again, ALL of the matters that you have highlighted in every single e-mail attachment are personal matters. The Arizona Constitution and various Arizona laws clearly outline that elected officials in Arizona cannot get involved with matters like this--they are between you and the mother of the children. If you think that she is in violation of the custody order and/or is putting your children "at risk", then YOU--NOT the Governor and NOT the Legislature--must take these matters into your own hands. I am not an attorney and cannot give you legal advice BUT you have the right to go back to DR/Family Law Court--either on your own or through an attorney. #2: In one of your many e-mail attachments you sent me, you forwarded a letter to the Judge. Again, I am not an attorney and not giving you legal advice BUT let me tell you that Judges have the right to hold litigants "in contempt of court". I would advise you not to try and contact the Judge through an informal communication like a telephone call, e-mail, letter. These avenues can be viewed as "ex parte' communications", which are against the law. #3: You know, all of us who communicate in this world of e-mails need to remind ourselves of the danger of these unsecured communications. You say that you love your children--I totally believe you. You say that you want the best for them--I totally believe you. BUT, you have forwarded e-mails to my Office and probably to Mr. Marten in the Governor's Office that, if I were your daughter, I would be totally embarrassed that you have put personal information about dynamics with your children and ex-wife are now "out in public"--you just have no idea who else is getting these documents. If I were your attorney, I would strongly advise you to stop--but, again, I am not an attorney. Again, a reminder: **The Arizona Constitution and AZ Laws do not allow ANY elected official in Arizona to get involved in ANY matter--not civil, not criminal, etc.--where that matter is currently under consideration by the Courts OR where a Judge has made a judicial decision. So, this means clearly that Mr. Marten and I cannot assist you in any of these matters. Your recourse is to appeal any judicial decision OR go back to court with new facts/information. To answer your question: **In Arizona, Judges stand for retention by the voter; **If you feel that a Judge violated Arizona laws, then you can file a complaint against the Judge by contacting the Judicial Commission at the AZ Supreme Court and they will tell you whether or not you might have "evidence" to do so. Again, not liking the decision of a Judge is NOT under state law and Supreme Court rules sufficient reason for a complaint action. Again, I ask you to strongly consider what all of this conflict between you and the mother is having on your children and I would ask you to not take these matters public, like you have. Perhaps you and your wife should engage the services of a professional mediator to try and work out your issues quietly and privately. Again, I hope that this additional information and thoughts assist you. If they have, then Mr. Marten and I have performed "constituent services" by helping you understand the reality of your particular PERSONAL situation. Maria Hoffman 8/15/10 8:57 a.m.: Dear Maria Hoffman, I know for a fact that you have written many letters to Arizona parents over the last 6+ years. You have earned between $4,000- $8,000 a month over the course of those years (because we have your contracts of hire with the state.) You are contracted to be the main gate keeper, to stop parents from going to any government officials to ask for help. I also have personal emails wherein government officials, who had meetings scheduled personally with me, had to recontact me and cancel those meetings, because they were told directly by you that they were not allowed to meet with me. I ask you since I am an advocate for Arizona and fight for multiple families how the hell would you know what it is that I would be talking to them about? What you are doing is illegal!!!! ~Melissa Diegel The following is an actual email example of an Arizona father who has fought avidly for years to see his precious daughters: 08/15/10 at 9:00Maria Hoffman AM Mr. Stark: I was going to send you another e-mail to finally put closure to your contact with Arizona Government but you sent this so let me respond: #1: Again, ALL of the matters that you have highlighted in every single e-mail attachment are personal matters. The Arizona Constitution and various Arizona laws clearly outline that elected officials in Arizona cannot get involved with matters like this--they are between you and the mother of the children. If you think that she is in violation of the custody order and/or is putting your children "at risk", then YOU--NOT the Governor and NOT the Legislature--must take these matters into your own hands. I am not an attorney and cannot give you legal advice BUT you have the right to go back to DR/Family Law Court--either on your own or through an attorney. #2: In one of your many e-mail attachments you sent me, you forwarded a letter to the Judge. Again, I am not an attorney and not giving you legal advice BUT let me tell you that Judges have the right to hold litigants "in contempt of court". I would advise you not to try and contact the Judge through an informal communication like a telephone call, e-mail, letter. These avenues can be viewed as "ex parte' communications", which are against the law. #3: You know, all of us who communicate in this world of e-mails need to remind ourselves of the danger of these unsecured communications. You say that you love your children--I totally believe you. You say that you want the best for them--I totally believe you. BUT, you have forwarded e-mails to my Office and probably to Mr. Marten in the Governor's Office that, if I were your daughter, I would be totally embarrassed that you have put personal information about dynamics with your children and ex-wife are now "out in public"--you just have no idea who else is getting these documents. If I were your attorney, I would strongly advise you to stop--but, again, I am not an attorney. Again, a reminder: **The Arizona Constitution and AZ Laws do not allow ANY elected official in Arizona to get involved in ANY matter--not civil, not criminal, etc.--where that matter is currently under consideration by the Courts OR where a Judge has made a judicial decision. So, this means clearly that Mr. Marten and I cannot assist you in any of these matters. Your recourse is to appeal any judicial decision OR go back to court with new facts/information. To answer your question: **In Arizona, Judges stand for retention by the voter; **If you feel that a Judge violated Arizona laws, then you can file a complaint against the Judge by contacting the Judicial Commission at the AZ Supreme Court and they will tell you whether or not you might have "evidence" to do so. Again, not liking the decision of a Judge is NOT under state law and Supreme Court rules sufficient reason for a complaint action. Again, I ask you to strongly consider what all of this conflict between you and the mother is having on your children and I would ask you to not take these matters public, like you have. Perhaps you and your wife should engage the services of a professional mediator to try and work out your issues quietly and privately. Again, I hope that this additional information and thoughts assist you. If they have, then Mr. Marten and I have performed "constituent services" by helping you understand the reality of your particular PERSONAL situation. Maria Hoffman 8/15/10 8:57 a.m.
from FB-RSS feed for Op Expose DCS Arizona #opexposecps http://bit.ly/2bqGqge
No comments:
Post a Comment