Tuesday, January 3, 2017

FB-RSS



Photo - Thr Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The Fourteenth Amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The case that affirmed a child's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to be safe in her home and person, to live in freedom of fear of unreasonable search AND reaffirming her right to due process: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/01/03/15-55563.pdf The judges upheld the districts court opinion that there is a reasonable expectation that a caseworker knows that it is indeed a crime to perjure testimony to sway the outcome of a CPS case. Caseworkers are bound to tell the truth in courtrooms because of the 4th and 14th Constitutional Amendment rights of the defendants AND their children. In short: Caseworkers cannot lie to sway the opinion of a judge or jury. Guess what? Just like every other American in a courtroom. I say: It's about time. Caseworkers really think it's O.K. to perjure themselves in the "best interest of a child". Reality check in the 9th district court. What does this decision do? This decision make it clear that caseworkers do not receive full immunity when it has been proven that they have indeed perjured themselves. Remember all the times I have mentioned documentation, timeline, keeping a notebook, getting a copy of your case file, getting court transcripts? THIS case is the reason why! I have been waiting for a decision like this for some time. If you have the documentation that your caseworker did indeed lie under oath, falsify documents, or perjure themselves....this ruling will assist you in seeking damages for for what has been done. Will it guarantee a wrongful termination suit? It may but I am not sure it will be what is needed to reverse an illegally obtained adoption. We will have to see how this progresses over time. It will be up to outstanding attorneys like Shawn McMillan to forge the path we take. We are hopeful that every caseworker that has ever lied in court is now shitting the proverbial razor blade. #TAKEN #AmericasTakenChildren #CorruptFamilyCourts #ChildProtectiveServices #WeAreComing4OurChildren: Thr Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The Fourteenth Amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The case that affirmed a child's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to be safe in her home and person, to live in freedom of fear of unreasonable search AND reaffirming her right to due process: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/01/03/15-55563.pdf The judges upheld the districts court opinion that there is a reasonable expectation that a caseworker knows that it is indeed a crime to perjure testimony to sway the outcome of a CPS case. Caseworkers are bound to tell the truth in courtrooms because of the 4th and 14th Constitutional Amendment rights of the defendants AND their children. In short: Caseworkers cannot lie to sway the opinion of a judge or jury. Guess what? Just like every other American in a courtroom. I say: It's about time. Caseworkers really think it's O.K. to perjure themselves in the "best interest of a child". Reality check in the 9th district court. What does this decision do? This decision make it clear that caseworkers do not receive full immunity when it has been proven that they have indeed perjured themselves. Remember all the times I have mentioned documentation, timeline, keeping a notebook, getting a copy of your case file, getting court transcripts? THIS case is the reason why! I have been waiting for a decision like this for some time. If you have the documentation that your caseworker did indeed lie under oath, falsify documents, or perjure themselves....this ruling will assist you in seeking damages for for what has been done. Will it guarantee a wrongful termination suit? It may but I am not sure it will be what is needed to reverse an illegally obtained adoption. We will have to see how this progresses over time. It will be up to outstanding attorneys like Shawn McMillan to forge the path we take. We are hopeful that every caseworker that has ever lied in court is now shitting the proverbial razor blade. #TAKEN #AmericasTakenChildren #CorruptFamilyCourts #ChildProtectiveServices #WeAreComing4OurChildren

from FB-RSS feed for Op Expose DCS Arizona #opexposecps https://www.facebook.com/AmericasTaken/photos/a.979241848832976.1073741828.976132759143885/1218681971555628/?type=3

No comments:

Post a Comment