Wednesday, July 27, 2016

FB-RSS

Reason for Protest: To bring awareness to the corruption and fraudulent acts of Family Courts and Child Protective Services. Our children, parents and families are being abused, destroyed and in some cases, murdered while the APA maintains its "no policy" policy, which we believe contributes to the problem which consist with the corruption within the system that is supposed to be in the best interest of our children and families. We ask for a conference: http://bit.ly/2aq0FXI Sponsors: Truth Exposed, Central Ohio Parental Alienation, the National Alliance of Targeted Parents. In support of a petition: http://bit.ly/new-apa-position-statement In support of the NATP Strategic Plan to Fight Child Psychological Abuse (see the NATP Facebook page) http://bit.ly/2abeYCq Peaceful, polite protests also to be held simultaneously at State APA Headquarters and at Psychological Organizations around the world: http://bit.ly/2aq0ewx Sign/Poster Themes: - "Collusion with Delusion Must Stop" - "Mental Health Must Not Be Complicit in Child Abuse" - "Pathogenic Parenting is Child Abuse" http://bit.ly/2abfz7a 1. A parent beat/drowned their children to death rather than let the other parent see them. The APA has neither acknowledged the obvious motive nor condemned the motive, by virtue of its “no position” policy: http://on.11alive.com/2aq0P1i 2. Another parent shot their children rather than let them see the other parent. The APA has neither acknowledged the obvious motive nor condemned the motive, by virtue of its "no position" policy: http://cbsloc.al/2abfeBt 3. A parent manipulated a child to enter into a suicide pact, rather than let the child see their other parent. The APA has neither acknowledged the obvious motive nor condemned the suicide pact, by virtue of its “no position” policy: http://bit.ly/2aq0cEZ 4. Since we first contacted the APA to request a revision of the APA policy on parental alienation, a child was diagnosed with cancer and died. The child was denied an opportunity for one of his parents to tell him how much he loved him. A hospital administrator misinterpreted the hospital's policy. The APA is unable to condemn this tragedy by virtue of its “no position” policy. The parent is one of the protestors. 5. A teen says she had been manipulated/controlled to say she hated her other parent. The APA has neither acknowledged nor condemned this manipulation, by virtue of its "no position" policy: https://youtu.be/MzwOmSLL0Pc 6. The APA has not responded to the testimony of a teen, who says "And then the child therapists. What did they do? Nothing! What therapy can you give to children who are suffering because they’re not allowed to see their [other parent]? What complete rubbish. They should’ve enforced it, and I was taken to see three of them. They should’ve given therapy to my [parent], so [they would have] let us go, without terror: http://bit.ly/2abfxMM 7. The APA has neither acknowledged nor condemned this incident in front of the Dallas Courthouse, by virtue of it's "no position" policy: https://youtu.be/f-0aneFygOo 8. The APA has not acknowledge that this can and does occur in "intact" families: http://bit.ly/2aq0oUK 9. By virtue of its "no position" policy, the APA cannot admit that if a parent causes a child to have developmental problems (attachment suppression), psychotic symptoms (fixed false believes about a parent), and some personality disorder traits (splitting, grandiosity, lack of empathy, haughty arrogance, and entitlement), that it rises to the level of Child Psychological Abuse (V995.51), which is defined as significant psychological harm to a child, especially when that parent is displaying the same basic symptoms: http://bit.ly/2abeZX8 10. The APA admits that "Childhood Psychological Abuse as Harmful as Sexual or Physical Abuse" but has not discharged its self proclaimed charter, the "dissemination of psychological knowledge about child abuse and neglect to the public, the state associations, and the divisions"; http://bit.ly/2aq0qfk http://bit.ly/2abfy3i 11. The left hand of the APA has a "no position" policy, while the right hand of the APA publishes associated peer reviewed research in its journals and publishes the 2015 "APA Handbook on Forensic Psychology, Volume 2" that acknowledges that existence of "parental alienation": http://bit.ly/2aq0sU7 12. The APA has not acknowledged that if a child is fine, but then after their parent’s relationship conflict, displays developmental issues, psychotic symptoms, and personality disorder symptoms, when the same symptoms and worse are displayed by a parent, it rises to the level of Child Psychological Abuse DSM V V995.51: http://bit.ly/2abeZX8 13. The APA has not acknowledge that severe "parental alienation", perhaps more accurately called pathogenic parenting, is simply a "manifestation of well understood pathologies", each of which has "substantial empirical support in the established literature of professional psychology": http://bit.ly/2abffWf 14. The APA has neither condemned nor acknowledged the horror of 3 children that is documented in "Victims of Another War", by virtue of its "no position" policy: https://youtu.be/9z-Tfs2C3hU 15. The APA admits that their current policy gets misinterpreted but has not updated it: http://bit.ly/2aq1Xlc 16. The APA admits that the task force report on which the current policy is based is "outdated" and "in need of review" , and declines to make it available, but has not updated its policy: http://bit.ly/2abfgJp 17. The APA has failed to acknowledge the testimony of Joe Rabiega, who told Newsweek: “It was like my [other parent] did not exist. My [aligned parent] brainwashed me to believe that the only parent figure or family member that mattered was [my aligned parent],” adding that his [aligned parent] would often tell him that if he didn’t do what he was told, no one would want him. His [aligned parent] also routinely threatened to kill himself" ... “I was trapped in this delusional world my [aligned parent] created.” http://bit.ly/2aq0SKg 18. The APA has not acknowledge the testimony of Ryan Thomas, who tells how he was manipulated to reject a parent in extensive video commentary: http://bit.ly/2abfvEE 19. While the APA maintains its "no position" policy, even an outspoken leading critic admits that " "I do not deny that parental alienation occurs and that a lot of people are hurt when there is an alienator." http://bit.ly/2aq0BHd 20. The "Big APA" has not kept pace with the "Little APA" in acknowledging what disordered parenting is like: http://bit.ly/2abfe4D 21. The APA has not acknowledged Dr. Miller's statements that a. "severe parental alienation cases are the most profoundly counter intuitive diagnosis in clinical science , even surpassing borderline personality disorders cases" (which is ironic because BPD/NPD is just one of the pathologies involved in pathogenic parenting ) b. "non-experts almost always get it exactly backwards" http://bit.ly/2aq0Wdh Dr. Miller teaches clinical decision making at Harvard Medical 22. By virtue of its 'no position" policy, the APA has not condemned an event, where, according to multiple investigations by 60 Minutes, much of the press in Australia was fooled, where later the children admitted there was no abuse: http://bit.ly/2abfbFE 23. Dr. Jennifer Harmon from APA Divisions 8, 9, and 39, says that "parental alienation is domestic violence." She has amassed vast empirical evidence and says that gender and parenting stereotypes fuel parental alienation, as described in this TED Talk: https://youtu.be/v3YdldNXZnQ 24. The APA is unable, by virtue of its "no position" policy, to condemn the following alienation scenario documented by CNN, where the alienated parent is squeaky clean before custodial interference caused the children to completely reject their parent: http://bit.ly/2aq03kG 25. Spoiler Alert for the Force Awakens: Since we contacted the APA about its "no position" policy, Hollywood released an alienation themed movie and pulled in $2 billion. Smoke manipulates Kylo Ren, as explained in depth here: https://youtu.be/m0EKkcN7r9s 26. The top US Law Enforcement expert in child sexual abuse, FBI special agent Ken Lanning, writing in a training manual for police, noted an extreme reluctance of people to believe the child sexual abuse could have happened. This tendency underlies each of the failure to report scandals. We believe there is a similar tendency in child psychological abuse, making it nearly impossible for people to accept that a parent could go a little delusional and harm their child. The exact quote is "Last and most importantly" .... "Regardless of intelligence and education and often despite common sense and evidence to the contrary, adults tend to believe what they want or need to believe. The greater the need, the greater the tendency." A PhD does not make someone immune to this natural tendency. http://bit.ly/2abfaS7 27. In many cases, entire sides of families are cut off. Grandparents no longer see their grandchildren. Children no longer benefit from relationships with grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Frequently, the beloved family pet is rejected also. We ask the APA "What exactly did Fido do to be rejected"? "What criticisms does the APA wish to send Fido"? 28. A parent has told a very typical, tragic story, which the APA is unable to admit is tragic, by virtue of its "no position" policy. There are thousands more of similar stories: http://bit.ly/2aq0XO8 A permit with the Washington DC Metropolitan Police is "in press". Logistics: The APA building is right next to Union Station, which has a DC Metro Stop. Google maps show it as a 0.2 mile walk (5 minutes). Press: The CNN building in Washington is only 187 feet away from the APA. We will be protesting on both sides of the building, including in front of CNN: http://bit.ly/2abfkZN

from FB-RSS feed for Op Expose DCS Arizona #opexposecps http://bit.ly/2aq0WK5

No comments:

Post a Comment